"I guess it's one for the old guys," Sampras joked at the award ceremony. He said at the press conference later on, "I made it competitive and I am serving very well."
"Pistol Pete" displays his trademark serves and volleys Saturday. The former world top player won the first set on a tie-break by 10-8 when neither player could reach a break of serve.
Sampras got the first but vital break of the match at 4-4 in the second set and went straight for the victory by 6-4.
"Sorry to disappoint you, but I am not coming back, " Sampras said when asked about whether he would return from retirement.
36-year-old Sampras, who retired from professional tennis five years ago, had won a record 14 Grand Slams.
Pete Sampras has defeated Roger Federer in the final of their three scheduled matches this time in Macau. Sampras took it to Federer in straight sets winning 7-6(10-8), 6-4 in 70 minutes.I have to say, well done Pete Sampras. Bravo. This is truly an extroadinary sporting achievement in time and in the modern game of tennis. Whether or not Roger Federer played at his absolute best is irrelevant, Pete Sampras after five years out of the game has defeated the grand master, where others have failed and failed again.
Sampras who fired down a number of trademark his massive serves put the current world number one into severe difficulty. Federer who was defeated by Sampras in the final of the three match series said that "Sampras could still be a top five player"...try a number one player Roger!
But in all seriousness Sampras has done very well in the shorter version of the game and to his credit notched up a victory. The 36 year old Sampras, who at times pumped out some major first serves at up to 210 km/hr, according to Federer could still be a top five tennis player in the world standings.
Sampras who has no intentions to return to world tennis, certainly put in an admiral stand where the rest of the world has struggled in recent times to put a dent in Federer's armour. After the match, Sampras who has been retired from the game for five years mentioned how much the game has changed with a lack of serve volley tennis, and the developments in tennis racquet technology being a catalyst for this.
With Roger Federer dominating the men's game, I think it was amazing to see Sampras take on Federer, hold his own, and change it up with Roger to great effect. The question is, if Sampras, as accomplished as he is, can still take it up to Federer with being out of the game for so long, what is wrong with the seasoned professionals on the men's tour? Why can't we find a group of all court challengers to Roger Federer like in the days of Sampras, Edberg, Agassi and so forth?
"I'm sort of surprised. This guy can play tennis, you know," Federer said after his loss.
He put on a positive spin on the match, saying he wasn't embarrassed to lose to his idol.
I would say on his day, Sampras can defeat anyone.